Evidence found
27 records across 2 countries and territories, 1987–2019.
Todiramphus tutus · GBIF taxon key 2475726
Where has the Chattering Kingfisher been recorded?
Todiramphus tutus occurrence evidence comes from 27 records in 2 countries and territories, from 1987 to 2019. Most records come from Cook Islands.
- 27 records
- 2 places
- 3 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: October.
3 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: October. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Chattering Kingfisher has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Chattering Kingfisher. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Cook Islands | 25 | |
| French Polynesia | 2 |
Related animals
Others in the family Alcedinidae.
Common Kingfisher
234,801 records
Belted Kingfisher
34,520 records
Ringed Kingfisher
2,926 records
Laughing Kookaburra
1,728 records
White-throated Kingfisher
1,534 records
Sacred Kingfisher
1,301 records
Pied Kingfisher
889 records
Gray-headed Kingfisher
659 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.