Evidence found
2 records across 1 countries and territories, 2017–2017.
Zosterops leucophaeus · GBIF taxon key 6100773
Where has the Principe Speirops been recorded?
Zosterops leucophaeus occurrence evidence comes from 2 records in 1 countries and territories, from 2017 to 2017. Most records come from São Tomé & Príncipe.
- 2 records
- 1 places
- 1 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: July.
2 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
one-off describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: July. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Where Principe Speirops has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Principe Speirops. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| São Tomé & Príncipe | 2 |
Related animals
Others in the family Zosteropidae.
Silver-eye
3,558 records
Japanese White-eye
2,983 records
African Yellow White-eye
747 records
Oriental White-eye
260 records
Swinhoe's White-eye
251 records
Cape White-eye
239 records
Whiskered Yuhina
110 records
Madagascar White-eye
84 records
Record pattern: one-off
One-off or limited records in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
One-off or limited records in the covered source. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.