Evidence found
886 records across 14 countries and territories, 1800–2026.
Zygaena trifolii · GBIF taxon key 7761138
Where has the Five-spot Burnet been recorded?
Zygaena trifolii occurrence evidence comes from 886 records in 14 countries and territories, from 1800 to 2026. Most records come from Germany.
- 886 records
- 14 places
- 88 years recorded
- Insecta class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.
3 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18002026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Five-spot Burnet has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Five-spot Burnet. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 306 | |
| France | 215 | |
| United Kingdom | 88 | |
| Luxembourg | 87 | |
| Spain | 56 | |
| Netherlands | 51 | |
| Belgium | 48 | |
| Switzerland | 9 | |
| Czechia | 9 | |
| Guernsey | 6 | |
| Portugal | 5 | |
| Denmark | 3 | |
| Jersey | 2 | |
| Greece | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Zygaenidae.
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.