Evidence found
270 records across 4 countries and territories, 1917–2026.
Myiothlypis leucoblephara · GBIF taxon key 8158524
Where has the White-browed Warbler been recorded?
Myiothlypis leucoblephara occurrence evidence comes from 270 records in 4 countries and territories, from 1917 to 2026. Most records come from Argentina.
- 270 records
- 4 places
- 37 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-22. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: June.
11 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: June. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19172026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where White-browed Warbler has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for White-browed Warbler. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Parulidae.
Yellow-rumped Warbler
103,345 records
Yellow Warbler
42,581 records
Common Yellowthroat
42,122 records
Orange-crowned Warbler
40,151 records
Wilson's Warbler
38,690 records
Pine Warbler
28,704 records
Ovenbird
27,895 records
Northern Waterthrush
20,376 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.