What Animal Lives Where

Where has the Common Siphonophore been recorded?

Nanomia bijuga occurrence evidence comes from 2,809 records in 27 countries and territories, from 1895 to 2025. Most records come from Australia.

HydrozoaSiphonophoraeAgalmatidaeNanomia

Observation evidence passport

Evidence found

2,809 records across 27 countries and territories, 1895–2025.

Nanomia bijuga · GBIF taxon key 2264848

Source coverage

CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.

Refreshed 2026-09-20. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.

What this means

The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: September.

12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.

What this does not mean

repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.

A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.

Compare this animal’s observation pattern

When it is recorded

JFMAMJJASOND

Peak month: September. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.

Records over time

18952025

Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.

Where Common Siphonophore has been recorded

The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Common Siphonophore. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.

PlaceRecordsShare
Australia 2,231
DR Congo 144
Costa Rica 95
Kiribati 44
American Samoa 37
Mexico 19
United States 19
Panama 18
US Virgin Islands 17
New Caledonia 16
South Africa 12
Niue 11
Antarctica 9
Seychelles 8
Tokelau 6
South Korea 5
Indonesia 4
Papua New Guinea 4
Yemen 4
Portugal 3
Peru 2
Philippines 2
Somalia 2
Brazil 1
Canada 1
Puerto Rico 1
Sweden 1
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.