Evidence found
41 records across 6 countries and territories, 1999–2025.
Phylloscopus sindianus · GBIF taxon key 7341578
Where has the Mountain Chiffchaff been recorded?
Phylloscopus sindianus occurrence evidence comes from 41 records in 6 countries and territories, from 1999 to 2025. Most records come from China.
- 41 records
- 6 places
- 10 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-22. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: April.
4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: April. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19992025
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Mountain Chiffchaff has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Mountain Chiffchaff. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Phylloscopidae.
Willow Warbler
1,733,808 records
Common Chiffchaff
1,212,776 records
Wood Warbler
222,615 records
Yellow-browed Warbler
28,319 records
Greenish Warbler
22,377 records
Pallas's Leaf Warbler
12,705 records
Western Bonelli's Warbler
7,268 records
Arctic Warbler
6,620 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.