Evidence found
49 records across 2 countries and territories, 1928–2020.
Tetracerus quadricornis · GBIF taxon key 2441199
Where has the four-horned antelope been recorded?
Tetracerus quadricornis occurrence evidence comes from 49 records in 2 countries and territories, from 1928 to 2020. Most records come from Nepal.
- 49 records
- 2 places
- 5 years recorded
- Mammalia class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: February.
4 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: February. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
19282020
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where four-horned antelope has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for four-horned antelope. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Bovidae.
domestic sheep
2,302 records
cow
744 records
Pyrenean Chamoios
604 records
chamois
567 records
bushbuck
567 records
kob
554 records
African buffalo
550 records
greater kudu
443 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records concentrated in part of the year. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.