Evidence found
172 records across 9 countries and territories, 1865–2026.
Urocolius indicus · GBIF taxon key 2482315
Where has the Red-faced Mousebird been recorded?
Urocolius indicus occurrence evidence comes from 172 records in 9 countries and territories, from 1865 to 2026. Most records come from South Africa.
- 172 records
- 9 places
- 42 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-08-23. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: August.
12 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: August. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
18652026
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where Red-faced Mousebird has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for Red-faced Mousebird. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
| Place | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 88 | |
| Namibia | 26 | |
| Angola | 22 | |
| Mozambique | 15 | |
| Botswana | 9 | |
| Zimbabwe | 5 | |
| Tanzania | 4 | |
| Malawi | 2 | |
| ZZ | 1 |
Related animals
Others in the family Coliidae.
Speckled Mousebird
1,666 records
Blue-naped Mousebird
326 records
White-backed Mousebird
142 records
Red-backed Mousebird
34 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.