Evidence found
83 records across 2 countries and territories, 2006–2025.
Ichthyaetus leucophthalmus · GBIF taxon key 7785213
Where has the White-eyed Gull been recorded?
Ichthyaetus leucophthalmus occurrence evidence comes from 83 records in 2 countries and territories, from 2006 to 2025. Most records come from Jordan.
- 83 records
- 2 places
- 9 years recorded
- Aves class
Observation evidence passport
Source coverage
CC0 GBIF Animalia occurrence facets, including country, month and year summaries.
Refreshed 2026-09-24. Inspect the taxon on GBIF.
What this means
The species has been recorded in the listed places in the stated source universe. Peak month: October.
9 months reach at least 10% of the peak facet count.
What this does not mean
repeated describes the record pattern, not a formal range, residency, abundance or conservation assessment.
A single record remains evidence of a recording, not proof that a population lives there.
Compare this animal’s observation pattern
When it is recorded
JFMAMJJASOND
Peak month: October. Records cluster in the months an animal is present and being looked for, so a summer peak can reflect observer effort as much as the animal.
Records over time
20062025
Recording effort has risen steeply almost everywhere since the 1990s, so a rising line usually shows more observers rather than more animals.
Where White-eyed Gull has been recorded
The countries below show where occurrence evidence exists for White-eyed Gull. They do not define a complete habitat range: survey effort differs by place, and historical or one-off records can appear alongside repeated presence.
Related animals
Others in the family Laridae.
Lesser Black-backed Gull
4,046,434 records
Herring Gull
3,247,099 records
Black-headed Gull
1,123,276 records
Mew Gull
986,748 records
Common Tern
519,969 records
Great Black-backed Gull
493,641 records
Mediterranean Gull
263,862 records
Arctic Tern
232,790 records
Record pattern: repeated
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.
Repeated records across many years and months. This is inferred from how many years and months the animal appears in, not from a range map — treat it as evidence, not a formal assessment.